🔍 Observations
Topline
- Q4FY26 revenue at ₹46,175 Mn — highest quarterly run-rate in the 18-month period, up 14.6% QoQ vs Q3FY26 (₹38,307 Mn) and 14.6% YoY vs Q4FY25 (₹40,292 Mn)
- Annualising the 18-month revenue (₹246,456 Mn ÷ 1.5) implies a ~₹164,304 Mn annual run-rate, up ~8.5% vs FY24’s ₹151,457 Mn — moderate organic growth after stripping period distortion
- Smart Infrastructure dominates at 56% of segment revenue (18M: ₹140,397 Mn); Digital Industries weakest performer, losing share to the other two segments
Bottomline
- Continuing operations PAT for 18M: ₹22,834 Mn vs FY24’s ₹19,619 Mn — annualised ~₹15,223 Mn/year implies ~22% step-down vs FY24 on an annualised basis, largely due to Energy demerger loss of contribution
- Q4FY26 continuing PAT: ₹3,552 Mn vs Q4FY25: ₹3,929 Mn — 9.6% YoY decline despite higher revenue, flagging cost pressure or mix shift
- Exceptional item (₹743 Mn labour code charge in Q3FY26) and demerger-related expenses (₹1,092 Mn over 18M) are one-time drags; clean recurring earnings modestly better than reported
Margins
- Segment EBIT margin (18M): ₹25,183 Mn on ₹251,681 Mn segment revenue = 10.0% vs FY24’s ₹17,968 Mn on ₹153,737 Mn = 11.7% — 170 bps deterioration
- Digital Industries EBIT collapsed: ₹3,042 Mn on ₹58,722 Mn (18M) = 5.2% vs ₹4,830 Mn on ₹40,961 Mn in FY24 = 11.8% — a 660 bps crash, the single biggest margin drag
- Q4FY26 EBIT margin recovery visible: segment EBIT ₹3,753 Mn on ₹46,630 Mn = 8.1% vs Q3FY26’s ₹3,533 Mn on ₹38,859 Mn = 9.1% — volume leverage not fully flowing to margins yet
Growth Trajectory
- Mobility is the strongest growth segment: 18M revenue ₹49,778 Mn vs FY24’s ₹29,161 Mn — annualised ~₹33,185 Mn, ~13.8% growth; EBIT margin held at ~6.9% (18M) vs 7.1% (FY24)
- Smart Infrastructure growing steadily: annualised ~₹93,598 Mn vs FY24’s ₹82,579 Mn — ~13.3% YoY, with EBIT margin improvement to 13.1% (18M) from 13.2% (FY24) — broadly stable
- Digital Industries revenue grew in absolute terms but profitability collapsed — a volume-without-margin expansion that needs structural explanation before investors can reward it